BarrierSystems or PLC control
A programmable logic controller (PLC) is the classic way to control a barrier: a programmer maps the use case in the controller. BarrierSystems is a platform of standard hardware and standard software that configures the use case instead of programming it.
The comparison names what makes the difference in practice for each topic. As of May 2024.
Six topics compared
| Topic | PLC control | BarrierSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Installation and commissioning | Every use case has to be mapped anew, with high individual effort. Long lead and project times because planning and programming are individual. High susceptibility to errors and frequent “testing in operation”. | Fast provision and low-cost implementation of individual customer requests as a module. Rollout and commissioning in one day, provided the rest of the installation is complete. The system runs reliably from day one. |
| One-time and running costs | Depending on the connections needed, PLCs are quickly oversized and expensive. High setup costs because every scenario is programmed from scratch. Every adjustment has to be developed manually and specifically. | Low-cost standard hardware (BaseLink and SmartKit) with replacement and extension options. Proven standard software with many features and continuous development. The license model covers the provision of all extensions and necessary adjustments. |
| Usability | Often outdated software with a “Windows 95 look and feel”, desktop programs only. Work processes are cumbersome or impossible, so much is done by hand. Low acceptance among users, so the system is not used and cannot be optimized. | User-friendly modern interfaces in ControlHub and ControlApp. All standard processes are covered, self-explanatory and well documented. High acceptance, users give feedback, development increases customer value. |
| Maintenance and support | Complex and therefore expensive adjustments over the period of use. Usually no bug fixes and security updates. Strong dependence on the one person who programmed the PLC. | Simple, fast and low-cost development in the form of modular extensions. Regular security and product updates at no extra cost, included in the license. Personal support by email and phone from a professional team. |
| Integration and scalability | High effort for writing specifications and during commissioning and testing. No interfaces to standard third-party software such as ERP systems or visitor management. Every additional site has to be equipped and programmed individually. | Simple specifications through standard text modules and existing functions. Interfaces to standard third-party software plus an open API for integrations. New sites go live simply, cost-effectively and in under a day. |
| Security features | Missing security updates create an ever greater risk of attacks. Hardware and software are not from one source, so security cannot be retrofitted simply or cheaply. | Regular security updates protect against attacks. Encrypted communication and a mature role and permission management. Security audits can be carried out at any time. |
Conclusion
- PLC control
- “That is how it has always been done.” Cheaper only at first glance, because follow-up costs and risks come on top; flexible, but only with high effort and additional costs.
- BarrierSystems
- A modern, user-friendly access management system. Security updates, support and continuous development justify the license costs; more options than a PLC solution on a secure foundation.
Your installation in comparison
Bring your use case. We will show how it is handled without PLC programming.